Actually, they do it very often. Richard Thaler, one of the groundbreaking behavioral economists, not only explains that everyone has a potential Homer Simpson hiding inside in “Nudge”, but also reinforces the work of psychologists who have become marketing gurus like Nobel Prize laureate Daniel Kahneman, pioneer of a two systems brain in “Thinking, Fast and Slow”.

At least, when it comes to decision-making and choice. Think about the decisions you make on a typical day. You lock your door so intuitively and login in to some of your favorite apps so easily that sometimes you go back to see if the door is actually locked or you can’t remember your password when the phone restarts. These are the actions you take without judgement and consideration – the automatic system 1. At other times, you have to recall a phone number you just dial once in a while or you have to sum up your grocery prices to check if you have enough money in your pocket, actions that ask some effort, attention and consideration – the reflexive system 2.

If emotions make choice less ponderate and rational, we should acknowledge some biases when designing the digital experience. Design and word options need to be in line with habits we even do not notice in ourselves.

Jakob Nielsen, pioneer of usability and founder of Nielsen Norman Group has a great point about being consistent: “Consistency is one of the most powerful usability principles: when things always behave the same, users don’t have to worry about what will happen.”. Uber, Bolt, Kapten and other gig economy players know that consistency matters when people change from one experience to another, from one of their apps to the contender. One single question, simple and similar word choice, and default destinations are all part of a look alike experience. If you know how to use one, you know how to use all.

People react positively to benefits and rewards. BJ Fogg, a Stanford University behavior scientist, and author of “Tiny Habits”, makes it clear in his book: “There is a direct connection between what you feel when you do a behavior and the likelihood that you will repeat the behavior in the future.” But if we give everything at once, we won’t be able to create a long relationship with a client or prospect. Use content to make it a progressive process or translate the benefits into material gains and it will create a bond or a habit.

We jump to conclusions very easily and assume that what you see is all there is (WYSIATI). What matters is consistency, not completeness of the story. Framing is very effective when dealing with this emotional bias. People tend to get the disposable information and treat it like the full scenario. That’s why we should focus on the positive side of a benefit.

We’ll be confused if the number of options exceeds the reasonable in terms of effort. “Less is more” is an adage you won’t find in the majority of insurance tools designed to deliver a quote. Not only brands are missing the ease and automatic system, they’re asking too many things in advance and making reflexive come in and realize that it’s not fair to ask so much for so little. Tools like insurance quote calculators give us some of the extremes when it comes to mental (and sometimes physical, if the information asked is not near) effort.

Imagine that you are wandering around the supermarket shopping for wine. Nathalie Nahai’s book “Webs of Influence” has a curious study about conversion and decision-making in this same context. In one experience, researchers played French and German music in a supermarket and came up with a weird conclusion. When they played French music, French wines sold more, but when they played German songs, German wines led. This is what priming is, an influence of something you’ve just experienced in your normal behavior.

Online, you’ll find many examples of priming: a homepage of a private school with pictures of early age kids when it goes up until secondary level or a signup page telling you more than needed and talking about a very sensitive priming topic, security.

We like to compare our performance and replicate others actions. If we track a goal or achievement and compare it to the community, the reward is higher and more pleasant. The Elevate app (Apple 2014 app of the year) is a clear example of mirror behavior that it’s the foundation of gamification. Besides being a great app for mental and soft skills training, you can compare yourself with the community and let the dopamine flow.

Now that we know that there’s plenty of bias that put intuition and emotion on top of a lazy rational side, it’s time to address it. We should start shaping a plan of action to conquer the emotional side of people and impact the easy- going decision taker. We don’t want to wake up System 2, the brainy profiler that will erode the experience and make it harder and more complex. And how should we do it? Well, UX writing was born to do that.

Digital marketing strategy has a lot to do with emotions. Empathy maps, personas, customer journeys and tone of voice is all about people and traits of personality. We can study deep these behavioral biases, as we do natively at Plot, and make people our valuable asset. In fact, knowing about people is knowing about experience and that’s why UX (user experience) has seen a sharp climb during the last years (Lexus UX model should also be selling pretty well, by the way).

User Experience (Design) is a discipline that normally lives in the field of Design, but the truth is that the experience of a digital product or service doesn’t end in design.

In addition to the wireframes and information architecture that result from User Experience work (which can be done by a UX designer or by someone outside the discipline with skills in this area, such as a Strategist), there are language and messages that support the “design”. And if there is a need for instructions and written communication, there are words. This is where UX writing comes in, and since 2018 UX writing is getting more and more attention.

UX writing (the US version, content design in Australia) lives between three dimensions: content strategy, design and user research and it deals with friction and uncertainty in digital experiences. Friction is anything that makes tasks harder or makes people feel confused, frustrated, and less likely to continue using the product. It is another way to look at cognitive load, the effort it takes to do a task. That’s why UX writing is much more than words. UX must take a seat from the very beginning of any interface you’re creating. No more “lorem ipsum”.